top of page
Search

Successful Tech Transfer of Amphotericin Liposomal Injection to a CMO in the Middle East

Updated: Apr 7

1.Challenge

A Contract Manufacturing Organization (CMO) based in the Middle East, experienced in biologics manufacturing, was selected to produce Amphotericin Liposomal Injection, a complex small-molecule injectable.

However, the CMO faced significant challenges:

  • Lack of experience in handling complex injectable formulations.

  • Language barrier: Most staff, including scientists and production personnel, did not speak or understand English, making training and communication difficult.

  • Complex manufacturing process involving:

    • Lipid complex formation with known stability issues

    • Spray drying under time constraints to achieve specific particle sizes

    • High-pressure homogenization, vial filling, and lyophilization

Scale-up gap: Prior development was done at a 20L batch size, whereas the CMO required a 60L batch. Unlike conventional injectables, complex formulations often behave unpredictably even with scale-up factors.


2. Objectives

  • Successfully train and handhold the CMO team to manufacture a highly complex product.

  • Achieve consistent, reproducible results at a larger commercial scale (60L).

  • Adapt and validate the process with available infrastructure and equipment.


3. Our Approach

Prepared detailed process flow diagrams

  • Identified equipment and analytical needs

  • Guided procurement and qualification of analytical instruments

Training & Method Transfer

  • Conducted foundational training on liposomal technology and characterization

  • Transferred test methods as per STP (Standard Testing Procedures)

  • Resolved technical queries promptly

Support at FAT (Factory Acceptance Test) Locations

  • Assisted CMO during FAT in India and China

Trial Batches

  • Two batches executed to test feasibility and team preparedness

  • Emphasis on managing high-volume in-process sampling and analysis

  • Highlighted gaps in lab handling capacity

Challenges Observed

  • Analytical discrepancies due to improper sample handling or equipment variance

  • Lyophilizer lacked control features; validated cycle had to be modified

  • Adjusted process parameters to match on-site conditions

⚠️ Trust Issues

  • Process modifications led to perceived R&D activity during tech transfer

  • Required clear communication and reassurance to CMO management

Final Execution

  • Post-optimization, three successful validation batches were completed

  • Stability studies initiated on the final product


Tech Transfer Phases
Tech Transfer Phases

4. Final Results

  • Technology successfully transferred for a complex injectable despite multiple operational and communication hurdles

  • First international tech-transfer experience—navigated cultural, linguistic, and technical complexities

Overcame interpersonal tension and misperceptions with teamwork, transparency, and technical confidence


5. Key Learnings

  • Technical expertise alone is not enough. Success requires adaptability, empathy, and cultural awareness.

  • Unlearning and relearning are essential when working with new teams, technologies, and geographies.

  • Real-world tech transfer demands flexibility without compromising on quality.


    Looking to scale up a complex injectable? Or planning a Tech Transfer in 2025? Let's talk!





 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page